The Great California Shake OUt
Here it comes again!
God gave me a mind to think and a heart to feel, but sometimes I get confused about when I should be thinking and when I should be feeling. That's when I just talk.
I wrote this essay for a seminar I'm taking on the philosophy of Physical Science.
Is science the antithesis of faith? This question always brings my mind back to the 1997 movie Contact, in which a staunch scientist seeking for extra-terrestrial contact has an out-of-world experience that she can’t “prove” but nonetheless in which she believes completely. This role reversal signifies that science and faith can co-exist, and that the traditionally dichotomous relationship between the two should be re-evaluated by both schools. I’m not saying that Hollywood is the key to bridging the gap between science and faith, but there is some credence to the point the movie attempts to make.
Traditionally, science is conceived as objective, factual and “real.” Western scientific thought has always assumed an “external reality independent of human perceptions” (Brown, p. 369), which has led many scientists – and most of the lay people – to the conclusion that the path of science is one that will eventually reveal all “truth.” This positivistic concept, though methodologically replaced long ago with a more critical approach to the world, still persists in the mind of the masses. I feel that much of the exaggerated debate between science and faith actually pivots around this mentality, rather than methodologies or definitions of either scientific exploration or religious experience.
But what if science is not objective? Scientific philosophy alludes that nothing can ever be proven as true, since an external reality in which the “truth” exists can never be reached by human perceptions. A theory can only be tested against falsification, and if it is not disproved, the theory is upheld until the next round of falsification tests – it is never true, but only not not true. In addition to this “negative nature” of science, the methodologies used to test theories can never be objective because the very fact that a theory is being tested creates a framework and context for the experiment that will influence the results. Inkpen refers to this as “world making” and states that scientists often ignore their world making because it “implies subjectivity in their world view.” (Inkpen, p. 84). He later goes as far as saying that science is not the rigid, fact-finding exploration of reality that most of us accept, but that “scientific thought and its change is strongly influenced, if not determined, by the society within which it exists” (Inkpen, p. 137).
I turn now to faith. Faith can be defined as belief without proof, but this is an overly simplistic view that begs for scientific scrutiny. However, criticizing the notion that faith is a "blind belief" belies the fact that faith and science share a common element: the inability to prove truth. Both science and faith espouse the assumption of unquestioned principles and the acceptance of a certain level of uncertainty. Viewing science and faith as dichotomous only illustrates a misunderstanding of the relationship between the two. Science claims a basis in proof, and some claim that faith can prove nothing (Comrie, p. 37). However, proof cannot be limited to things that are readily observable, as human observation is framed in social context and personal experience. In this sense, science can prove nothing either. According to one definition of faith in the New Testament, it is the "substance [basis or assurance] of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen." (Hebrews 11:1). Is not theory an assurance of the hoped-for result of the scientific method? Are not data the evidence of phenomena which exist in a reality that in its purest form cannot be seen? A close examination of science and faith, in an atmosphere free of traditional debate, shows common ground at a fundamental level. The most divergent elements between the two may possibly be merely the terminology and constituents.
In light of the above arguments, I claim that science is not the antithesis of faith. Both require an acceptance of things not seen; both result in a near-complete belief in a reality that cannot logically be proven. Science views empirical data from observations as paramount; faith places personal experience of confirmation above all. In a way, science and faith can work together to make the world a better place – or perhaps they already do.
Last year, I made a somewhat lengthy analysis of an internet scam ("Google Money Masters"), so I won't go into those details here (plus, I'm at work). But I thought this was too fun to pass up. I was looking for a grunge font for work at urbanfonts.com and when I clicked on the category name, my browser opened another window to "Weekly Health News" showing an article on the "1 Tip of a Flat Belly: A Surprising New Way to Burn Fat Quickly." I have to say, this is a pretty good looking scam.
The first thing that made me wonder is the picture of the supposed reporter lady person. I've seen her all over the web, in suspicious-looking ads. The second indicator was that the article supposedly originated in (guess where?) the city where I work, as well as the example of the woman losing 46 pounds. Try it out - go to the article and I'm sure you'll find that the article magically originated in the city in which you are currently sitting, too! My third source of suspicion came from the comments section. They were all from the last two days. Fantastic. Then last but not least, all of the links on the page lead to an advertisement for AcaiMax. Scroll to the bottom and want to read about football? Too bad, it's AcaiMax. How about Travel, or Racing (which is interestingly enough accompanied by an image of a mountain scape... I guess "mountain racing?")? Nope, AcaiMax again. Then I pulled up the source code and had a good laugh.
The article purports to have been published on July 13, 2010, two days ago. So I look at the code and find a little (messy!) bit of javascript that ends with this:
See the "-2" at the end? Yeah, that says to set the date to two days before the current date and show it on the page. This happens several times throughout the page, and is obviously dishonestly reporting the date to make it appear as though the article (and comment section) is recent. Want to post a comment? Too bad, because based on the source code and script, there's nothing actually submitting your comment anywhere!mydate.setDate(mydate.getDate()-2)
There's more, but I'll stop. I just find it incredibly entertaining to see how the "scam" continues to evolve. This one looks pretty real, if you ask me. But that's the idea - looks are deceiving, and now that we, the Web 2.0 generation, have such short attention spans, the marketers now that we look at the page for 5 seconds and then act. Try to make it 10 and I think you'll see a lot more than they're showing you.
PS To the authors of this page, may I suggest a faster way to build an array, since it looks like you were in a hurry:var month = [
'January',
'February',
'March',
'April',
'June',
'July',
'August',
'September',
'October',
'November',
'December'
];
Topics: design, news, people, superfluous, thoughts
With the popularity of a previous post on Vietnamese Input Methods and the recent demise of dict.vietfun.com, I feel compelled to post a list of online Vietnamese language resources. This list is, of course, not exhaustive, so please add any other helpful links to the comments. As we so painfully realize today with the launch of an "not-so-improved" replacement for dict.vietfun.com, web resources are terribly ephemeral and therefore may not exist tomorrow. I compiled this list awhile ago (updated for now), and I'm leaving the now-defunct sites as an archive.
It's gone. The Vietnamese dictionary that I've been using for years and years and years (well, at least since 2003), and has served as my homepage since the beginning, has finally gone the way of all the earth. Returned to the dust. Paid the final visit to grandma and grandpa. Gone back to the happy hunting grounds. :( I'm sad.
The dictionary of which I speak is the English - French - Germany [sp] - Vietnamese Dictionary once available at dict.vietfun.com. The genius Hồ Ngọc Đức created the dictionary software and the database of terms. He is truly dedicated to extending the Vietnamese language to the world via the Internet, and leads the ongoing effort toward developing VietWordNet, a "large-scale online lexical-semantic Vietnamese language net" (like the English WordNet developed at Princeton). His contribution to the Vietnamese language on the world wide web is perhaps the most influential, considering that apparently all current Vietnamese online dictionaries use large portions of his database, including the Vietnamese Wiktionary.
It thus saddens me to see the most intuitive and useful tool in accessing the above resource vanish from the Web. Why was this the best dictionary? Absolutely no ads. Simultaneous language lookup (a drop-down box is a terrible way to choose language!). After lookup, auto-focus to the input box and auto-selection of text (allowing user to enter the next term without having to navigate to the input and/or select the text). Right-click on a word in the definition to lookup that word. These features provided a seamless, speedy workflow that minimized the amount of lost time with keyboard-to-mouse-and-back hand movement. I remember countless times looking up a list of mixed words (both English and Vietnamese) without touching the mouse once. This functionality was in place before Web 2.0 and mobile interface concepts had emerged mainstream - truly a web app beyond its time.
All of the current online Vietnamese databases have some of these features, but most revert to a language drop-down, severely limited efficiency and doubling time when translating. I find the drop-down an eyesore that may conserve screen real estate but lacks functionality (in this application). In a subsequent post, I will list the dictionary resources that I will now have to use since my trusted site is gone under, grimacing each time I have to click for a language and see a gaudy ad.
I've had a lot on my mind lately, so I'm going to distract myself for a moment by blogging about random stuff.
Recently I've realized that I need to organize my online life. I have so many accounts in so many online services that I don't even remember where I am. So the purging has begun. I started with mybloglog and snapfish. There will be many more to come.
In the meantime I am streamlining my online life by arranging each service into a certain function: web development stuff here, personal stuff there, networking stuff way, way over in the corner. This will hopefully stop the scatter-brained and inefficient approach to "staying connected" (I'm falling out of love with that phrase... I think I was "over-connected" for a time).
I just cleaned my back porch today, to follow along with my online endeavors (I should have been doing my homework but ohwellitcanwait). This cleaning and organizing is all part of a spiritual purge, in hopes of a tighter vision and more focused energy on tackling life. After the cleansing of the porch (despite my nasal passages full of dust), I feel the effects already.
Online life in a nutshell:
Year of maturing - the prevailing theme - I felt it would be a big year but didn't have much to show for it except school - but I see now it's more of an internal progression, a growing up - xanghe represents the care free, blissful days of perpetual honeymoons - that phase has passed and it's now on with adult life - on the way home from work, I realized I'm approaching 30, which is not old, but it's too old to claim ignorance or innonence as I have been doing - recently I told my younger brother to be a man, but was I projecting? - over the years, xanghe has transformed from a silly nickname to a symbol of my continual search for meaning, depicted by the ubiquitous bee - time has passed for me to claim xanghe as my alias, but it will remain a reminder of my search - it's time to be a man
Topics: faith, superfluous, thoughts
I stumbled on Blaise Aguera y Arcas' TED talk (which led to this talk) from Cameron Moll's twitter feed which opened up to me the world of Seadragon, Photosynth, and the new Bing maps. I guess I've been neglecting Microsoft to my own detriment.
Let's look at Seadragon, which revolutionizes the concept of image browsing, allowing users to pan and zoom hi-res iamges as easily and smoothly as they do an online map. I remember seeing an application that used the Google Maps interface to pan and zoom large photos, which I thought was really ingenious but it looked like it only garnered a niche following if that. Now the concept has gone mainstream under Arcas' touch at MS and the result is stunning. Here's an example of Yosemite. You'll need Silverlight to view it, but it's worth it (and I never advocate downloading non-standard components, but this is an exception).
The future is here. We as internet community contributors, sharing our thoughts and images and lives with a global community, are more and more able to recreate our experiences online to share with the world (and not through VR fluff which doesn't count because the idea is to escape reality in those games). Some call it augmented reality. I call it the reality, because that's the direction our world is heading.